Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)

Citation
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Parent Document
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Effective Date
2010-03-16

Other Sections in This Document (232)

Full Text

484 chars
-28-
complexity of the issues in this case simply did not warrant the requested amount of
“lawyering.” We also conclude there was a significant amount of duplicative work,
in part caused by transitions in the attorneys of record. For those reasons, we
determine it is reasonable and appropriate to reduce the hours expended by each of the
attorneys and paralegals by one-third, while leaving their hourly rates undisturbed.
See Hensley, 461 U.S. at 434 (“Cases may be overstaffed.”).