Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)

Citation
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Parent Document
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Effective Date
2010-03-16

Other Sections in This Document (232)

Full Text

410 chars
Even if the admission were indeed an error, any possible prejudice was cured by the
above instruction. See Johnson v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 734 F.2d 1304, 1309 (8th
Cir. 1984) (“To admit the report under these circumstances would amount to admitting
the opinion of an expert witness as to what conclusions the jury should draw[.]”).
With regard to Johnson’s testimony as a whole, Winter makes only general