Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)

Citation
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Parent Document
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Effective Date
2010-03-16

Other Sections in This Document (232)

Full Text

227 chars
Recognizing we are not bound by a rigid mathematical formula, we
nevertheless, are persuaded a single digit multiplier is appropriate in the present case.
We take our guidance from the Supreme Court’s assessment of single-digit