Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)

Citation: Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010) 1.
Parent Document: Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2010-03-16
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/231/quigley-v-winter/ ↗

Full Text

659 chars

1.      Standards of Review
       “We review a district court’s denial of a motion for judgment as a matter of law
de novo.” Heaton v. The Weitz Co., 534 F.3d 882, 887 (8th Cir. 2008) (citation
omitted). “We ‘must affirm the jury’s verdict unless, after viewing the evidence in the
light most favorable to [Quigley], we conclude that no reasonable jury could have
found in [her] favor.’” Id. (quoting Moysis v. DTG Datanet, 278 F.3d 819, 824 (8th
Cir. 2002)). “We ‘will not set aside a jury verdict unless there is a complete absence
of probative facts to support the verdict.’” Id. (quoting Wilson v. Brinker Int’l, Inc.,
382 F.3d 765, 769 (8th Cir. 2004)).

Other Sections in This Document (232)

Full Text