Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)

Citation
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Parent Document
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Effective Date
2010-03-16

Other Sections in This Document (232)

Full Text

572 chars
-12-
enjoyment of rights granted and protected by the [FHA],” because another jury
instruction and question on the verdict form addressed Quigley’s claim of coercion,
intimidation, and interference with housing rights. Because there was only one blank
on the verdict form for the jury to fill in the amount of compensatory damages for all
three of Quigley’s FHA claims, Winter raises the possibility Quigley recovered
damages twice under the same theory of recovery. Winter claims these alleged errors
in the jury instructions and verdict form entitle him to a new trial.