Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)

Citation
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Parent Document
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Effective Date
2010-03-16

Other Sections in This Document (232)

Full Text

690 chars
While the evidence of “quid pro quo” harassment was not overwhelming, after
viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Quigley, we conclude there was
sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict. Specifically, when Quigley inquired
about the likelihood of receiving her deposit back from Winter, Winter fluttered his
hand against Quigley’s stomach and said, “My eagle eyes have not seen everything
yet.” The jury could reasonably infer Winter was telling Quigley the return of her
deposit was conditioned upon Winter seeing more of Quigley’s body or even
receiving a sexual favor, which would amount to “quid pro quo” sexual harassment.
We will not disturb the jury’s verdict.