Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)

Citation
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Parent Document
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Effective Date
2010-03-16

Other Sections in This Document (232)

Full Text

439 chars
Furthermore, we find the district court erred in its consideration of Winter’s
ability to pay. Even if a defendant’s ability to pay could be an appropriate
consideration in awarding attorney fees, the record in this case adequately supports
Winter is a substantial owner of real estate, and Winter did not submit any evidence
of his financial situation or his net worth to address any issue of his inability to pay
a substantial fee award.