Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Citation
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Parent Document
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 2010-03-16
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/231/quigley-v-winter/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (232)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Full Text
699 charsWhile we agree with the district court that the jury’s punitive damage award was excessive, we disagree with the district court’s assessment that $20,527.50, which is one and a half times the compensatory award, sufficiently reflects the reprehensibility of Winter’s conduct. We conclude an appropriate punitive damages award in this case is $54,750. This amount is four times greater than Quigley’s compensatory *956damages ($13,685.00), which we find is an appropriate ratio under the circumstances of this case. This amount comports with due process, while achieving the statutory and regulatory goals of retribution and deterrence. See Campbell, 538 U.S. at 425, 123 S.Ct. 1513. 2. Attorney Fees