Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Citation
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Parent Document
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 2010-03-16
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/231/quigley-v-winter/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (232)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Full Text
919 charsDuring her trial testimony, Johnson of the SCHRC reported Quigley had received counseling services at Siouxland for depression caused by the sexual harassment. This testimony was elicited by Winter’s attorney during cross-examination. Winter then sought to introduce Nolan’s testimony to prove Quigley did not report sexual harassment to Nolan and lied to Johnson when she said she had. Quigley objected to Nolan testifying, arguing Nolan’s testimony would violate the psychiatrist-patient or physician-client privilege. The district court heard Nolan’s proposed testimony outside the presence of the jury. The district court determined Nolan’s testimony was inadmissible because Winter failed to prove Quigley did not tell anyone at Siouxland about the sexual harassment. We find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s exclusion of Quigley’s medical records and Nolan’s testimony. B. Quigley’s Claims on Appeal