Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)

Citation
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Parent Document
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Effective Date
2010-03-16

Other Sections in This Document (232)

Full Text

490 chars
In arguing there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict, Winter
focuses solely on the retaliation aspect of 42 U.S.C. § 3617. As Quigley points out,
retaliation is only one form of conduct prohibited under § 3617. Viewing the
evidence in the light most favorable to Quigley, we conclude there was more than
sufficient evidence of coercion, intimidation, and interference with Quigley’s
enjoyment of her housing rights, other than retaliation, to support the jury’s verdict.