Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)

Citation
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Parent Document
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Effective Date
2010-03-16

Other Sections in This Document (232)

Full Text

569 chars
Moreover, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Quigley, we
conclude there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict in favor of
Quigley on her sex discrimination claim. Winter’s contention that he had a legitimate,
non-discriminatory reason for any discriminatory behavior fails because the jury’s
verdict demonstrates the jury did not believe Winter. Because we find the district
court sufficiently submitted each claim to the jury, we find no error in the district
court’s use of only one space for compensatory damages on the verdict form.