Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)

Citation
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Parent Document
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Effective Date
2010-03-16

Other Sections in This Document (232)

Full Text

421 chars
In lieu of remanding the case to the district court, Quigley requests us to
conduct a lodestar calculation and award the appropriate amount of attorney fees.
Quigley insists a remand to the district court would create a “serious risk of substantial
continued litigation,” because, based on the district court’s previous decision, Quigley
believes “another appeal to [our court] may be necessary if the issue is remanded.”