Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)

Citation: Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Parent Document: Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2010-03-16
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/231/quigley-v-winter/ ↗

Full Text

745 chars

Winter maintains Instruction No. 8A was erroneous because Quigley presented
no evidence (1) Winter “refused to rent or otherwise made unavailable dwellings to
her because of her sex”; (2) Quigley’s “rental agreement was any different than those
of [Winter’s] other tenants, . . . her rent was raised or lowered, [or] any act was taken
with respect to the above matters at all, let alone because of [Quigley’s] sex”; or
(3) Winter “made a statement with respect to rental of his property that indicated a
preference, limitation, or discrimination based on sex.” Winter also protests
Instruction No. 8A’s inclusion of the following language: “[I]t is unlawful under the
[FHA] to coerce, intimidate, or interfere with any person in the exercise and

Other Sections in This Document (232)

Full Text