Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Citation
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Parent Document
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 2010-03-16
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/231/quigley-v-winter/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (232)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
- Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Full Text
830 charsYet, later, in Campbell, the Court declared, “Our jurisprudence and the principles it has now established demonstrate *955... few awards exceeding a single-digit ratio between punitive and compensatory damages, to a significant degree, will satisfy due process.” Campbell, 538 U.S. at 425, 123 S.Ct. 1513. The Court continued, “Single-digit multipliers are more likely to comport with due process, while still achieving the State’s goals of deterrence and retribution.” Id. The Court reiterated there was “a long legislative history, dating back over 700 years and going forward to today, providing for sanctions of double, treble, or quadruple damages to deter and punish.” Id. (citing Gore, 517 U.S. at 581 n. 33, 116 S.Ct. 1589). The district court then declared, “While these ratios are not binding, they are instructive.” Id.