Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)

Citation
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Parent Document
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Effective Date
2010-03-16

Other Sections in This Document (232)

Full Text

338 chars
A district court’s decision to admit or exclude testimony is reviewed for an
abuse of discretion. See, e.g., US Salt, Inc. v. Broken Arrow, Inc., 563 F.3d 687, 689
(8th Cir. 2009). “A district court enjoys wide discretion in ruling on the admissibility
of proffered evidence, and evidentiary rulings should only be overturned if there was