Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)

Citation: Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Parent Document: Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2010-03-16
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/231/quigley-v-winter/ ↗

Full Text

1,052 chars

-7-
       Winter denies he subjected Quigley to sexual advances or requests for sexual
favors, and, alternatively, any sexual harassment Quigley experienced was not
sufficiently severe or pervasive to support the jury’s verdict. Viewing the evidence
in the light most favorable to Quigley, we conclude Quigley presented sufficient
evidence of numerous unwanted interactions of a sexual nature that interfered with
Quigley’s use and enjoyment of her home. Quigley testified Winter subjected her to
unwanted touching on two occasions, made sexually suggestive comments, rubbed his
genitals in front of her, placed several middle of the night phone calls to her home,
made repeated unannounced visits, and, on one occasion, while Winter lay on
Quigley’s couch, had to be told to leave her home at least three times before he
complied. We emphasize that Winter subjected Quigley to these unwanted
interactions in her own home, a place where Quigley was entitled to feel safe and
secure and need not flee, which makes Winter’s conduct even more egregious.

Other Sections in This Document (232)

Full Text