Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)

Citation
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Parent Document
Quigley v. Winter, 598 F.3d 938 (2010)
Effective Date
2010-03-16

Other Sections in This Document (232)

Full Text

524 chars
In reviewing the district court’s denial of Winter’s motion for judgment as a
matter of law, we must view all facts in the light most favorable to Quigley and afford
her all reasonable inferences . See HOK Sport, Inc. v. FC Des Moines, L.C., 495 F.3d
927, 934 (8th Cir. 2007). “‘[W]here conflicting inferences reasonably can be drawn
from evidence, it is the function of the jury to determine what inference shall be
drawn.’” Id. (quoting Canny v. Dr Pepper/Seven-Up Bottling Group, Inc., 439 F.3d
894, 900 (8th Cir. 2006)).