Section 4-61dd

Citation: Section 4-61dd
Parent Document: Dept. of Public Health v. Estrada, 349 Conn. 223 (2024)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2024-06-11
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10131752/dept-of-public-health-v-estrada/ ↗

Full Text

1,076 chars

Furthermore, even if this court had concluded that the rebuttable pre-
                sumption applied and that E established a prima facie case, the depart-
                ment would have rebutted this presumption by demonstrating that three
                union grievances led to a determination that the same adverse employ-
                ment actions E challenged before the commission were taken for just
                cause, the evidence that the human rights referee credited supported
                the department’s nonretaliatory justifications, including evidence that E
                exhibited poor work quality both before and after her disclosure, and
                E’s first written reprimand was issued nearly one month after the disclo-
                sure, and then only after E again submitted another approval letter to
                the commissioner for his signature without first confirming the facts
                reported in connection with that approval. Argued September 14, 2023—officially released June 11, 2024 Procedural History

Other Sections in This Document (239)

Full Text