Skip to main content

Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 687271.pdf

Citation
Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 687271.pdf
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Source verification
official_capture_completeness_unverified

Full Text

1,506 chars
2 Kadoranian v. Bellinqham Police Dep't. 119 Wn.2d 178, 191, 829 P.2d
1061 (1992); see Norcon Builders. LLC v. GMP Homes VG. LLC. 161 Wn. App.
474, 486, 254 P.3d 385 (2011) (declining to consider an inadequately briefed
argument).
3 RAP 2.5(a); Roberson v. Perez. 156 Wn.2d 33, 39, 123 P.3d 844 (2005).
-4-
             

No. 68727-1-1 (consol. with
No. 68927-4-1) / 5

Unlawful Detainer Actions Generally

An unlawful detainer action brought under RCW 59.12.030 is a summary

proceeding designed to enable the recovery of possession of leased property.4
"The action is a narrow one, limited to the question of possession and related

issues such as restitution ofthe premises and rent."5 Due to the summary nature

of the action, a trial court generally does not permit the assertion of

counterclaims that are not '"based on facts which excuse a tenant's breach.'"6

The civil rules are the rules of practice for unlawful detainer actions,7 but when
the civil rules conflict with the unlawful detainer statute, the statute, as a "special

proceeding," controls.8 Washington courts require strict compliance with the time

and manner requirements for unlawful detainer actions9 and strictly construe
them in favor of the tenant.10 The superior court has jurisdiction over unlawful

detainer actions.11 The state constitution vests the superior court with broad

authority over real estate disputes, and the unlawful detainer statute explicitly