DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 42 A.3d 478 (2012)

Citation
Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 42 A.3d 478 (2012)
Parent Document
Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 42 A.3d 478 (2012)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2012-05-22
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2297138/eagen-v-commission-on-human-rig... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (112)

Full Text

370 chars 
case and, thus, that it was not his intent to link that case to the bill. See 46 H.R. Proc., Pt. 9, 2002 Sess., p. 2940, remarks of Representative O’Rourke. Contrary to what the plaintiff argues, Representative O’Rourke’s statement, on its face, does not “expressly [state] that the legislature did not intend for the burden shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp.