DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 42 A.3d 478 (2012)

Citation
Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 42 A.3d 478 (2012)
Parent Document
Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 42 A.3d 478 (2012)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2012-05-22
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2297138/eagen-v-commission-on-human-rig... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (112)

Full Text

446 chars 
burden shifting framework and the adverse employment action standards, commonly used in retaliation cases, do not apply to § 4-6 ldd cases. He fails to tell us, however, what differences exist between the terms and what alternative framework should be applied in § 4-61dd cases. He simply contends that they are different and that the term personnel action should be construed more narrowly than the term employment action. We conclude otherwise.