Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 42 A.3d 478 (2012)

Citation: Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 42 A.3d 478 (2012)
Parent Document: Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 42 A.3d 478 (2012)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2012-05-22
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2297138/eagen-v-commission-on-human-rig... ↗

Full Text

1,078 chars

“Dr. Schwartz specifically indentified [items] . . . that [were] not returned to him. ... He further testified that he received eleven empty folders, but that he did not keep empty folders. ... In his testimony, the [plaintiff] posited a slightly different explanation for why Dr. Schwartz was not permitted to pack his own belongings: not only was there concern about embarrassing Dr. Schwartz, but there [was] also a security concern about letting him come to his office. . . . This belated security concern lacks credibility not only because it was not raised at the time the decision was made . . . but also because the purported safety concern is discredited by the [plaintiffs] own testimony that he was [not aware] of Dr. Schwartz having threatened anyone. . . . Finally, the purported security concern lacks credibility because Dr. Schwartz was not only allowed to return to his office to pack some items ... he was also allowed access, without any kind of restrictions, to areas of the university that any member of the public could access . . . .” (Citations omitted.)

Other Sections in This Document (112)

Full Text