Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 42 A.3d 478 (2012)

Citation: Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 42 A.3d 478 (2012)
Parent Document: Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 42 A.3d 478 (2012)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2012-05-22
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2297138/eagen-v-commission-on-human-rig... ↗

Full Text

859 chars

The referee found that the plaintiff “failed to return to [Schwartz] all of his personal property from his office in retaliation of his whistle-blowing. . . . [T]he [plaintiffs] explanation for not allowing [Schwartz] to retrieve his belongings from his office is not worthy of credence and is a pretext for retaliation. The explanation, that Dr. Schwartz’ presence ‘would be very awkward for him’ and ‘embarrassing for him’ ... is flatly contradicted by Dr. Schwartz’ repeated communications that he wanted to retrieve his belongings ... by Dr. Schwartz’ coming to the university without embarrassment to meet with human resources personnel . . . by Dr. Schwartz coming to the university to retrieve some of his personal belongings from his office on October 27, 2008 .... He was also willing to have campus security officers or representatives from his *586

Other Sections in This Document (112)

Full Text