Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 42 A.3d 478 (2012)

Citation
Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 42 A.3d 478 (2012)
Parent Document
Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 42 A.3d 478 (2012)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2012-05-22

Other Sections in This Document (112)

Full Text

322 chars
After reviewing the parameters of Title VII, as interpreted by federal case law, we disagree with the plaintiffs contention that the term personnel action should be more narrowly construed than the term employment action and that, therefore, Title VII cases cannot be applicable to § 4-61dd cases. See Hashimoto v. Dalton,