Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- Citation
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- Parent Document
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2022-04-26
Other Sections in This Document (128)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. Gilbert, 343 Conn. 90 (2022)
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
- § 46a-58
Full Text
2,500 charscourthouses, each of which was significantly farther from
her residence. The complainant sought to hold the branch
responsible for the alleged misconduct under three civil
rights statutes: (1) Connecticut’s employment discrimi-
nation statute, the Connecticut Fair Employment Prac-
tices Act, General Statutes § 46a-60; (2) Connecticut’s
general antidiscrimination statute, General Statutes § 46a-
58 (a), which prohibits any person from depriving any
other person of rights secured by law on account of
the victim’s membership in a protected class; and (3)
Title VII, as a predicate to a further violation of § 46a-
58 (a).
Following a public hearing before the commission,
the referee found that the complainant’s allegations
were substantiated, a finding that the branch does not
contest in the present appeal. The referee awarded the
complainant seven days of back pay for the work time
she lost while attending the public hearing, as well as
prejudgment and postjudgment interest on the back pay
award, all pursuant to General Statutes (2012 Supp.)
§ 46a-86 (b),1 which provides remedies specifically for
victims of discriminatory employment practices in vio-
lation of § 46a-60.2 The referee also awarded the com-
plainant $47,637 in attorney’s fees and $50,000 in emotional
distress damages pursuant to § 46a-86 (c), which provides
remedies for violations of, among other things, the gen-
eral antidiscrimination statute, § 46a-58. Finally, the ref-
eree granted injunctive relief, including an order that
‘‘[t]he [branch] shall give the complainant the option of
returning to the Danielson courthouse.’’
The branch brought an administrative appeal pursu-
ant to General Statutes § 4-183 (a), in which it contended
1
Hereinafter, unless otherwise indicated, all references to § 46a-58 (a)
are to the version in the 2012 supplement to the General Statutes. See
footnote 3 of this opinion.
2
It is not clear from the record whether the referee ordered interest at
a rate of 5 percent or 10 percent.
April 26, 2022 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 39