DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 46a-64c

Citation
Section 46a-64c
Parent Document
Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Sullivan Associates, 250 Conn. 763 (1999)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1999-10-12
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7898215/commission-on-human-rights-oppo... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (133)

Full Text

596 chars 
The defendant in this case refused to lease to the relators, Patricia Hanson and Patricia Roper, because its established requirements for renting its property were in conflict with those of the section 8 program. There is no basis, as the majority concludes, to find that the defendant crafted its rental policy in order to discriminate against section 8 recipients. I would conclude that refusing to accept the terms of a section 8 lease does not itself constitute unlawful discrimination as proscribed by § 46a-64c. I, therefore, would affirm the trial court’s judgment. Accordingly, I dissent.