DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 46a-64c

Citation
Section 46a-64c
Parent Document
Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Sullivan Associates, 250 Conn. 763 (1999)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1999-10-12
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7898215/commission-on-human-rights-oppo... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (133)

Full Text

596 chars 
Although we disagree with the trial court’s construction of the statutory exception, we emphasize that we accept its subordinate characterization of the nature of the defendant’s minimum income requirement. The good faith of the defendant’s business judgment has never been questioned, and we do not question it now. The stipulated facts contain nothing to suggest that the reasons proffered by the defendant for refusing to rent to the relators were pretextual.34 Finally, the uniformity of the defendant’s leasing practices similarly is not subject to question in light of the stipulated facts.