Deutsche Bank AG v. Vik, 349 Conn. 120 (2024)

Citation: Deutsche Bank AG v. Vik, 349 Conn. 120 (2024)
Parent Document: Deutsche Bank AG v. Vik, 349 Conn. 120 (2024)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2024-05-28
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10131755/deutsche-bank-ag-v-vik/ ↗

Full Text

1,193 chars

Action to recover damages for, inter alia, violation
         of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, and for
         other relief, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial
         district of Stamford-Norwalk, where the court, Hon. Ed-
         ward T. Krumeich II, judge trial referee, denied the
         defendants’ motion to dismiss, and the defendants appeal-
         ed to the Appellate Court, Elgo, Clark and Lavine, Js.,
         which reversed the trial court’s decision and remanded
         the case with direction to grant the defendants’ motion
         to dismiss; thereafter, the plaintiff, on the granting of
         certification, appealed to this court. Reversed; judg-
         ment directed.
           David G. Januszewski, with whom were Thomas D.
         Goldberg and, on the brief, Sheila C. Ramesh, pro hac
         vice, Sesi V. Garimella, pro hac vice, John W. Cerreta
         and Jennifer M. Palmer, for the appellant (plaintiff).
           Monte E. Frank, with whom were Dana M. Hrelic
         and Meagan A. Cauda, for the appellees (defendants).
0, 0                         CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL                                     Page 3

Other Sections in This Document (136)

Full Text