Deutsche Bank AG v. Vik, 349 Conn. 120 (2024)

Citation: Deutsche Bank AG v. Vik, 349 Conn. 120 (2024)
Parent Document: Deutsche Bank AG v. Vik, 349 Conn. 120 (2024)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2024-05-28
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10131755/deutsche-bank-ag-v-vik/ ↗

Full Text

692 chars

Construing the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, this
          court concluded that many of the tactics A allegedly used to disrupt,
          delay, and otherwise interfere with the sale of N Co., including stacking N
          Co.’s board of directors with family members and associates, submitting
          a disingenuous bid to acquire N Co., coordinating with E to have the
          plaintiff’s execution lien deregistered, and forging and backdating the
          document purporting to grant C a right of first refusal, occurred outside
          of the context of any judicial proceeding and, therefore, were not covered
          by the litigation privilege.

Other Sections in This Document (136)

Full Text