Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 21-80a

Citation
Section 21-80a
Parent Document
Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal, 45 A.3d 627 (2012)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2012-06-26

Other Sections in This Document (97)

Full Text

660 chars
[6] The defendants asserted that Nancy Dickal's involvement in the following activities triggered § 21-80a (a), thereby barring the plaintiff's summary process action: (1) the formation of the residents association; (2) the residents association's action against the plaintiff; and (3) good faith complaints filed with government agencies. Because we, like the Appellate Court, conclude that the exception under § 21-80a (b)(1) would permit the plaintiff to maintain the present summary process action even if the defendants had engaged in protected conduct, we need not reach the question of whether any of these activities would in fact satisfy § 21-80a (a).