Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal, 45 A.3d 627 (2012)

Citation
Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal, 45 A.3d 627 (2012)
Parent Document
Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal, 45 A.3d 627 (2012)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2012-06-26

Other Sections in This Document (97)

Full Text

528 chars
Because § 21-80(b)(1)(C) already requires a showing of material noncompliance with the rental agreement to justify an eviction, the legislature must have intended § 21-80a (b)(1) to contemplate an additional requirement, such that the exception would encompass some, but not all, conduct that is in material noncompliance with the lease. Otherwise, the protection that arises upon engaging in one of the activities specified in § 21-80a (a) would be rendered a nullity with respect to residents who own their own mobile home.[8]