DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal, 45 A.3d 627 (2012)

Citation
Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal, 45 A.3d 627 (2012)
Parent Document
Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal, 45 A.3d 627 (2012)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2012-06-26
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2295282/fairchild-heights-inc-v-dickal/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (97)

Full Text

377 chars 
In light of this conclusion, I turn to the question of whether, under a proper construction of § 21-80a (b)(1), the Appellate Court's judgment affirming the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff should be affirmed. In my view, the meaning of the pertinent exception, both generally and as applied to the facts of the present case, is relatively straightforward.