Section 205

Citation: Section 205
Parent Document: Cole v. Harris, 187 U.S. App. D.C. 156 (1977)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 1977-11-14
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7891523/cole-v-harris/ ↗

Full Text

687 chars

. See 24 C.F.R. § 236.56(a), quoted in note 13 supra. Paragraph (b), as noted, sets out the two necessary conditions for any exception. Although the record is not conclusive on this point, it does not appear that HUD considered Sky Tower as a project suitable for exceptional treatment. By the reference in the affidavit to the project’s “past history,” HUD was taking note, doubtlessly, of the one increase already granted, the two abandonments by contractors, the lien placed on the property, and the original election of the mortgagee to foreclose. . 509 F.2d at 698. . Ibid. . Maj. op. at 164 of 187 U.S.App.D.C., at 598 of 571 F.2d. . See pp. 167-168, pp. 601-602 of 571 F.2d supra.

Other Sections in This Document (158)

Full Text