Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 4625

Citation
Section 4625
Parent Document
Cole v. Harris, 187 U.S. App. D.C. 156 (1977)
Effective Date
1977-11-14

Other Sections in This Document (158)

Full Text

338 chars
While the majority avoids responding to Caramico directly,11 the question of whether HUD’s act here was an acquisition “for a [federal] program or project,” i. e., a voluntary acquisition, must ultimately be faced under the notice clause discussed later. Hence it is helpful to look at what the District Court said relevant to this point: