Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Cole v. Harris, 187 U.S. App. D.C. 156 (1977)

Citation
Cole v. Harris, 187 U.S. App. D.C. 156 (1977)
Parent Document
Cole v. Harris, 187 U.S. App. D.C. 156 (1977)
Effective Date
1977-11-14

Other Sections in This Document (158)

Full Text

880 chars
*160On September 12,1975, the District Court granted partial summary judgment for the tenants, holding that the tenants who had vacated Sky Tower were entitled to benefits under the Uniform Relocation Act. Specifically, the court entered a declaratory order that any person who was a tenant of Sky Tower on September 27, 1974, and who had vacated his or her apartment as a result of HUD’s notice, was entitled to a prorated portion of the benefits provided under Sec-tion 204 of the Act16 for the period between the date that tenant left Sky Tower and the date the tenants were permitted to return pursuant to the court’s preliminary injunction (i. e., August 1, 1975). The government took this appeal from the holding that the Uniform Relocation Act applies. The tenants cross-appeal from the termination of benefits on August l.17 II. APPLICABILITY OF THE UNIFORM RELOCATION ACT