Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Sykes v. RBS Citizens, N.A., 2 F. Supp. 3d 128 (2014)

Citation
Sykes v. RBS Citizens, N.A., 2 F. Supp. 3d 128 (2014)
Parent Document
Sykes v. RBS Citizens, N.A., 2 F. Supp. 3d 128 (2014)
Jurisdiction
New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date
2014-03-04

Other Sections in This Document (127)

Full Text

748 chars
In his reply, Sykes contends that he learned in 2012 that Kelley, in connection with a Real Estate Commission proceeding, produced a different version of the “cash-for-keys” proposal than he had given Sykes. The revised version, which Sykes attached as an exhibit to his reply, had a later proposed move-out date. Sykes argues that if he had received the revised version, he would have accepted the proposal and his property would not have been destroyed because Kelley would not have turned off the utilities in the home. *148Even if the court could consider the exhibits in this context, Sykes does not allege these facts in the amended complaint. Therefore, the court does not consider that argument as to the sufficiency of Sykes’s fraud claim.