Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Sykes v. RBS Citizens, N.A., 2 F. Supp. 3d 128 (2014)

Citation
Sykes v. RBS Citizens, N.A., 2 F. Supp. 3d 128 (2014)
Parent Document
Sykes v. RBS Citizens, N.A., 2 F. Supp. 3d 128 (2014)
Jurisdiction
New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date
2014-03-04

Other Sections in This Document (127)

Full Text

525 chars
In response, Sykes moved for leave to amend his complaint to add factual allegations and to add claims for violation of the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq.,1 fraud, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and conversion. RBS, CCO, and FNMA (collectively, “mortgage defendants”) filed an objection, and Bank of America and BNYM (collectively, “bank defendants”) filed a separate objection.2 Both objections argue that granting Sykes leave to amend the complaint would be futile.3