DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 46a-64c

Citation
Section 46a-64c
Parent Document
Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities Ex Rel. Arnold v. Forvil, 25 A.3d 632 (2011)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2011-08-30
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2318907/commission-on-human-rights-oppo... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (123)

Full Text

360 chars 
In addition to the defendants’ repeated acknowledgments in their brief of their rejection of the relators due to the absence of a cash security deposit, we also note that, in the joint stipulation of facts submitted to the trial court, the parties agree that “[Jean] Forvil rejected the [guarantee] because he required and expected a cash security deposit.” 16