DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 46a-64c

Citation
Section 46a-64c
Parent Document
Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities Ex Rel. Arnold v. Forvil, 25 A.3d 632 (2011)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2011-08-30
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2318907/commission-on-human-rights-oppo... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (123)

Full Text

430 chars 
Finally, the defendants claim that the trial court awarded excessive compensatory damages to the rela-tors for their alleged emotional distress. The defendants bring this claim under the following theories: (1) the $7600 compensatory damages award for each of Arnold’s children was “pure speculation” because the children did not testify at the trial and Arnold did not describe their emotional distress in her testimony; and *283