DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 46a-64c

Citation
Section 46a-64c
Parent Document
Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities Ex Rel. Arnold v. Forvil, 25 A.3d 632 (2011)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2011-08-30
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2318907/commission-on-human-rights-oppo... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (123)

Full Text

594 chars 
220 Conn. 192, 596 A.2d 396 (1991), this court considered a case with nearly identical facts relevant to the issue of discrimination. In that case, a prospective tenant introduced evidence that proved that she had been denied an apartment for a prohibited discriminatory reason. Id., 195. In our review of the trial court’s judgment, we noted that the “case that sets forth the standard to be applied where there is direct evidence of discrimination is Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228, 109 S. Ct. 1775, 104 L. Ed. 2d 268 (1989).” 13 Miko v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities,