DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities Ex Rel. Arnold v. Forvil, 25 A.3d 632 (2011)

Citation
Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities Ex Rel. Arnold v. Forvil, 25 A.3d 632 (2011)
Parent Document
Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities Ex Rel. Arnold v. Forvil, 25 A.3d 632 (2011)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2011-08-30
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2318907/commission-on-human-rights-oppo... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (123)

Full Text

426 chars 
The trial court found the following facts, which are not challenged on appeal. In early 2006, Arnold met with the defendants to view an apartment for rent in a building owned by them. The defendants informed Arnold that she would need to provide a security deposit, which equaled twice the monthly rent of $800. Arnold replied that she would provide a guarantee 3 in lieu of cash to satisfy the security deposit, to which *267