Freccia v. Freccia, 232 Conn. App. 353 (2025)

Citation: Freccia v. Freccia, 232 Conn. App. 353 (2025)
Parent Document: Freccia v. Freccia, 232 Conn. App. 353 (2025)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2025-05-06
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10513133/freccia-v-freccia/ ↗

Full Text

2,746 chars

II
AC 46038
A
First, we address the claim raised by the defendants
in AC 46038 that the notice to quit served on them was
invalid. We are not persuaded.
The following additional factual and procedural his-
tory is relevant to this appeal. It is not in dispute that
the notice to quit served on the defendants was signed
by Mark A. Sank, who is identified on the notice to quit
as the attorney for ‘‘Theresa K. Freccia, Executor.’’12 The
original complaint was brought by ‘‘Theresa K. Freccia,
executor of the estate of Frank J. Freccia, Jr.’’ The
of parties, not an appellate court, to clearly identify how and where in the
record the claim that the party is raising on appeal was preserved for review
and where in the record the trial court’s ruling on the claim may be found
. . . . That is especially true in a case . . . in which the pleadings are
voluminous. We, therefore, decline to review this claim.’’ (Citation omitted;
emphasis omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State ex rel. Dunn v.
Burton, 229 Conn. App. 267, 294, 327 A.3d 982 (2024). This court’s rationale
in Burton applies equally to the claim before us. Relying on the authority
discussed in this opinion, and because the defendants have not demonstrated
that they are entitled to an extraordinary level of review of this unpreserved
claim, we decline to reach its merits.
12
The notice to quit provides: ‘‘I hereby give you notice that you are to
quit possession of the premises located at 40 Locust Street, Building 2 and
Garage now occupied by you, on or before September 19, 2021, for the
following reasons:
‘‘-Nonpayment of Rent
‘‘-Lapse of Time
‘‘-You never had a right or privilege to occupy the premises or any part
thereof
‘‘-You originally had a right or privilege to occupy the premises, or any
part thereof, but such right or privilege has terminated
‘‘All payments tendered after service of this Notice to Quit will be
accepted as use and occupancy, attorney’s fees and costs without
waiving any rights to proceed with an eviction action.
‘‘Dated at Stamford, Connecticut this 13th day of August, 2021.
‘‘Theresa K. Freccia, Executor
‘‘By Mark A. Sank, Her Attorney.’’
0, 0 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 27

Other Sections in This Document (93)

Full Text