Freccia v. Freccia, 232 Conn. App. 353 (2025)

Citation: Freccia v. Freccia, 232 Conn. App. 353 (2025)
Parent Document: Freccia v. Freccia, 232 Conn. App. 353 (2025)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2025-05-06
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10513133/freccia-v-freccia/ ↗

Full Text

1,310 chars

Next, we address the claim raised by the defendants
       in AC 46037 that the court improperly failed to conclude
       that they had a present right to remain in the subject
       property or that equitable considerations precluded the
       plaintiff from obtaining judgment in her favor.8 We are
       not persuaded.
           8
             We note that, in this part I B of the opinion, we have combined multiple
       interrelated claims raised by the defendants in AC 46037 into a single claim.
       We have done so in the interest of efficiently addressing the interrelated
       claims. In their principal appellate brief, the defendants claimed that (1)
       ‘‘[e]quitable considerations preclude the plaintiff from evicting her son and
       the generational family business from its long maintained location,’’ (2)
       ‘‘[t]he uncontradicted and documentary evidence establishes that both an
       actual and an equitable or constructive trust has arisen in favor of [Guin],
       with respect to the subject premises pursuant to the will and trust [of the
       decedent],’’ and (3) ‘‘[t]he evidence establishes [Guin’s] right to remain in
       the family business premises based upon estoppel.’’
Page 18                   CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL                        0, 0

Other Sections in This Document (93)

Full Text