DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Freccia v. Freccia, 232 Conn. App. 353 (2025)

Citation
Freccia v. Freccia, 232 Conn. App. 353 (2025)
Parent Document
Freccia v. Freccia, 232 Conn. App. 353 (2025)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2025-05-06
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10513133/freccia-v-freccia/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (93)

Full Text

598 chars 
In each of the three appeals, this court declined to reach the merits of the
         respective defendants’ unpreserved claim that the trial court had abused
         its discretion and had prejudiced them by consolidating for trial the action
         underlying their respective appeal with four other related summary process
         actions brought by the plaintiff because the defendants’ attorney did not
         articulate that claim with sufficient clarity before the trial court and the
         defendants did not demonstrate that it warranted an extraordinary level
         of review.