Section 425

Citation: Section 425
Parent Document: Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2011-06-27
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5810370/wallace-v-mccubbin/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (190)

Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425

Full Text

344 chars

Under these circumstances, I see no reason to criticize an analysis that is consistent with the statute’s goal as expressed in its legislative history, is a reasonable vehicle to promptly and efficiently identify and dismiss unmeritorious lawsuits or causes of action, has been approved by our Supreme Court, and has withstood the test of time.