Section 425

Citation: Section 425
Parent Document: Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2011-06-27
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5810370/wallace-v-mccubbin/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (190)

Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425

Full Text

468 chars

While we have focused our discussion on Wallace and Owen’s assertions of liability based on the three-day notice and unlawful detainer action, we have thoroughly considered their allegations, evidence, and arguments in regard to unprotected activity as well as protected activity. Based on the showing Wallace and Owen made in the trial court, they failed to establish a probability of prevailing on their first and 13th causes of action as against McCubbin and Merck.