Section 425

Citation: Section 425
Parent Document: Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2011-06-27
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5810370/wallace-v-mccubbin/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (190)

Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425

Full Text

464 chars

Nonetheless, it is also true that the court in Oasis did not explicitly limit the application of the Mann rule to causes of action that were based solely on protected activity. While there might be important policy reasons for so limiting it—as we have discussed ante—we can find no suggestion in Oasis that our Supreme Court would not also approve of Mann in the context of a mixed cause of action, which is, of course, the very context in which Mann was decided.