Section 425

Citation: Section 425
Parent Document: Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2011-06-27
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5810370/wallace-v-mccubbin/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (190)

Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425
Section 425

Full Text

336 chars

For these reasons, a rule by which the plaintiff must show the probability of prevailing on alleged claims of protected activity, and only those claims of protected activity, is aligned with public policy and consistent with the statute’s language and legislative history. But what about Mann? d. The Reasoning in Mann Is Not Persuasive