DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)

Citation
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Parent Document
Wallace v. McCubbin, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1169 (2011)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2011-06-27
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5810370/wallace-v-mccubbin/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (190)

Full Text

343 chars 
McCubbin and Merck contend that the first and 13th causes of action arose from activity protected by the anti-SLAPP statute and that Wallace and Owen did not show a probability of prevailing on the merits. We begin with a brief description of the anti-SLAPP statute and then proceed with our analysis. A. Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16