Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)

Citation: Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Parent Document: Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2012-03-27
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2295755/li-li-v-canberra-industries/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (51)

Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q

Full Text

379 chars

Richardson’s negative review was written in February, 2000. The plaintiff questioned the legality of certain practices in March, 2000. Lee’s April 26, 2000 negative review, Schmeizl’s two negative reviews on March 30, 2000, and May 1, 2000, and Schmeizl’s May 31, 2000 ninety day review recommending termination, all occurred within several months of the plaintiffs remonstrance.